Ah, at last someone gets to the crux of the matter.
You still have to find the perp via some other means.
Then take DNA samples and process those. But wait, you also have to sequester every cop who visited the crime scene and not let them touch any evidence for weeks on end. And not just the evidence from one crime scene, but all the crime scenes using this technology. Once the cops set foot on the premises they too will be tagged. As well as their wives and co-workers that come in contact with their uniforms, objects they handled, and any perps they happen to apprehend.
Your average burglary detective would spread the DNA from several recent robberies to every suspect they hauled in. Would do wonders for their arrest rates. *cough*.
So the DNA taging system builds a web of uselessness around itself, which spreads wider daily, while at the same time provides not a single additional clue to help you catch the thief.
And I don't believe that bit about being hard to wash off either. After all, if you can sample it by simply using a swab, how tightly can it be bound?
Source: http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdotScience/~3/tsbZMXPi5-E/story01.htm
bay bridge band of brothers presidents george washington horsetail falls ice t new york knicks
No comments:
Post a Comment